The ReBoot Wiki
Register
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
One other point, on those sites, they sometimes have information from books or games included, but only under a sub-section at the very bottom of an article labeled 'Apocrypha'. --[[User:Preator|Phong]] 14:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 
One other point, on those sites, they sometimes have information from books or games included, but only under a sub-section at the very bottom of an article labeled 'Apocrypha'. --[[User:Preator|Phong]] 14:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
Would the game be considered Apocryphal if it was created with the input of the "official" creators of ReBoot? [[User:Daecon|Daecon]] 14:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 5 February 2008

How about the ReBoot video game that was made on the Playstation several years ago? I think that was made using the involvement of the ReBoot creators, so should that count as Canon information? Daecon 05:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

In regard to the ReBoot video game, an article describing it in detail would be a wonderful addition to the site. As for mentioning it in other articles, that is not concidered canon. I am a member of other sites about tv shows, one of them nationally aclaimed. Their policy is the same, articles detailing the games are fine, but they shouldn't be included in articles about the characters, or tv episodes. --Phong 14:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

One other point, on those sites, they sometimes have information from books or games included, but only under a sub-section at the very bottom of an article labeled 'Apocrypha'. --Phong 14:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Would the game be considered Apocryphal if it was created with the input of the "official" creators of ReBoot? Daecon 14:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)